🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in other EU countries